Hextom: Bulk Image Edit & SEO
Shopify native image App - Bulk Image Edit by Hextom
Rating
4.8
feedback
2,246
chart
#518
All reviews
Rating Breakdown
Review RSS Feed
May 13, 2022
Went to subscribe to a plan through the app, and the option I wanted was not available. They lowest plan was $49 a month, where we only need the $9.99 or $20 a month plan
May 26, 2022
Thought it was good app, but every time schedule for the edit, always fail. Developers are less than helpful to do anything. Editing scheduled tasks are nightmare to change. Too many restrictions.
July 26, 2021
Be more useful if it didn't reduce image resolution when resizing to a degree so low that pictures look dull and flat. Not all that good. Just paying for automator, which is free on the mac. Asked a question from support but got no reply.
July 19, 2021
Looked great until I ran it. Is badly coded to work with variants, totally ignores the options in the filename which meant I lost perfectly good filenames for poor seo ones. Such a basic thing to miss :(
Feb. 18, 2021
Not too impressed. When it said Bulk Image Editor I assumed I would be able to edit my pics in one easy step but I found, even after the upgrade that I needed to slow load all my new pictures to each item, one by one, like a slug...AGAIN! Feel like I waisted 9,99 in the upgrade (which should of been included for the feature that it actually offer...its literally LAME). Save your time and MONEY! If you need to add new pictures to your product (either Variant or add image)- The APP will sadly default to the same screen which you will have 4 steps to redundantly repeat per item (picture). I sat there for 40 minutes uploading new variant pictures one by one and the APP does not even ask if you would like to replace the image or add onto its variant. USE SHOPIFY's EDIT SYSTEM FOR THE PRODUCT VARIENT AND SAVE YOUR HARD EARNED CASH! THIS AP WAS A JOKE!!!
Sept. 11, 2020
There is problem about reverting, stickers are stucked even if it is says that reverted. I don't know how to fix it, I think I have to change my images :(
April 17, 2020
No idea. I'm just now using it and this irritating survey popped up. Makes me want to delete the app.
Nov. 11, 2019
The rename of picture file is not available in the free plan... . It was one of my best wish. I will try an other apk Thanks anyway
Aug. 29, 2019
I only need this app to make 10k pictures square. $99 a month is outrageous.I have no other options. There has to be something else out there.
Feb. 6, 2019
have tried editing aspect ratio. don't know how far this is useful. will use it extensively and post another review. not impressed by the first use
Nov. 22, 2018
Watermark feature is disabled for free plan. Also, as previously stated by other reviews, there is no function to preview how your image will look. You have to guess at what % line height you want. Not something I would consider paying for.
Nov. 19, 2018
very difficult to use. There is no way to "preview" what your image will look like once it's watermarked and from what I can tell, there is no way to revert it back to the original image if you don't like the result. Pretty disappointed considering i had to upgrade to the professional plan to even try this.
Nov. 16, 2017
i need to add a frame to individuals products, is it possible here, if not i need the revoque the payment because this app whont work for me and i just updated to the 9 dollars payment. i appreciate your help!
Aug. 11, 2017
This app is false advertising! It is NOT free!! You have to pay to resize your images or do much of anything else!
July 13, 2017
Looked like a good app. Setting the alt-Text works fine, renaming and resizing the files, too! But I reverted the resizing, because I wasn't satisfied with the results, the images stayed the same size. Now I have low quality product images in my shop...even they said reverting is possible for 3 months
Oct. 9, 2016
After spending $10 to have pictures resized I was very displeased with the quality ( pictures were pretty much all grainy). Looks like I will be spending more money to have them reverted back to original... 600px did not work very well.